Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Chapter 6’ Category

Fanciful flights across the globe, then back to Prague

Recently, I attended the 10th Annual Northeast Media Literacy Conference at the University of Connecticut.  There, I delivered a presentation on the development of higher order communications skills through non-fiction platforms using critical analyses and digital production of news media, documentary essays, and public service announcements (Recording, Synthesizing, and Evaluating Reality: Non-fiction Media in the Secondary Classroom).  It is typically an invigorating experience for teachers to be able to engage with colleagues from other schools, grade levels, and disciplines, and this conference offered ample opportunities for a rich diversity of interactions.

The two keynote speakers were Dr. Kathleen Clarke-Pearson, a pediatrician who discussed her perspective as a “mediatrician,” and Howard Schneider, former managing editor for Newsday and founding dean of the SUNY-Stony Brook School of Journalism, who spoke about his work establishing a news literacy course for all students at the university.  Dr. Clarke-Pearson stressed the need to balance continually the positives and negatives of new methods of communication and immersion in digital media, and she pointed out the importance of considering neurobiology and studies that have investigated the impacts of media usage on young children.  She highlighted the work of Michael Rich at the Center on Media and Child Health and that of Dimitri Christakis in early brain development, in which he has shed light on deficient language development and significant attention problems due to the negative effects of television exposure in young children.  After lunch, Howard Schneider recounted the development of a news literacy program at Stony Brook in which all undergraduates take a required journalism course to prepare them to be discerning news consumers and competent citizens.  His opening salvo was “The Truth is in Trouble,” and, while describing the essential questions and frameworks of their program, he focused on the importance of imparting three parameters to students for evaluating news to qualify it as reliable information: Verification, Independence, and Accountability.

Howard Schneider with Gutenberg and Stewart

Moreover, the conference was attended by a large group of international educators and professionals from media communications fields across the globe, and the final event of the conference was a panel discussion with five members of this group.  We were able to hear from Rania Al Malky, the Chief Editor of Daily News Egypt, who discussed the well acknowledged role of social media in the revolution in Egypt, as well as the functions of moving image media in how the uprisings played out and were experienced nationally and throughout the globe.  During the panel discussion,  the Rev. Mike Nsisak Umoh, the Director of the Center for Media Development at the Catholic University of Lagos, Nigeria, spoke of worldwide cultural shifts taking place and their possibilities to impact deep social change.  He described the development of media literacy as offering the possibility of “a Panacea for World Peace Development” and commented that “Media is the new World Currency.”  In particular, he cited the need to revisit the controversial MacBride Report for UNESCO from 1980, and the degree to which its analyses and recommendations have continued to resound pertinently to those working in media literacy in the developing world.

Karel Zeman contemplating a sequence

Another member of the panel was Pavlina Kvapilova, the executive director of New Media Division for Czech Republic national television networks (with the intriguing channel order of 1, 2, 24, 4), and a dynamic speaker and debater.  In particular, she spoke about the use of social media by the Czech national television services to keep connected to their audience and keep their news division pertinent to viewers.  Check out the pages for children’s programming — they’re incredibly fun to look at and remind me of the great traditions in Czech animation.  A personal favorite movie that I was reminded of as I looked at these pages was “Ukradená vzducholod” — or, The Stolen Airship — from 1967 by the great Czech director (and animator and special effects wizardKarel Zeman.  I saw this movie (as Le Dirigible Volé) a few years ago with my eldest son in the Studio des Ursulines in Paris , one of the most magical cinemas in the world that has specialized in children’s movies for a number of years having started out nearly a century ago as a theater showing movies of the avant-garde.  How the media world turns…

Karel Zeman with other tools of creation

Closer to home, I can report that some of the most resonant connections that I made during the conference were those closer to my own backyard.  During lunch, I met groups of colleagues from Ellington and Simsbury High Schools in Connecticut, and it was such a pleasure to share stories of the challenges we face in the classroom as well as new ideas and tales of our ever evolving roles as 21st century educators.

Read Full Post »

One of the logos for the group responsible for the Kony 2012 Viral Campaign and 11 short films over the past decade.

Earlier this week, while my media class was working in groups on an upcoming project, one student turned to me and said, “Kony 2012.  You’ve got to check this out.  A major event is happening right now in how media works.  I’m not saying it’s good, but you should check it out.” Later during that same period, other students started talking about it; some had shared it from Facebook, some were talking about celebrity posts on Twitter, some were thinking about doing something in response to this piece.  The next day, I even heard 7th graders talking about it in a Middle School class that I teach.

Indeed, this week, a phenomenon burst into the scenes of social media, non-fiction moviemaking, and how moving images are functioning in our world today.  I would recommend for teachers and students to look at the Kony 2012 movie using the questions for Chapter 6, “Recording and Presenting Reality,” on pages 237-238 of Moving Images.  Notable subjects for discussion of this media document are the presence of director Jason Russell in the voiceover and images; the use of his young son as one of the primary figures in the images; the digital techniques used in the movie; and marketing methods employed by the filmmakers and this group.  Here is an excellent article from the New York Times on the phenomenon of the Kony Video going viral.  In addition, here is a one of the rare news pieces appearing in major media – in this case from Democracy Now – about the deployment of troops to Uganda by the Obama administration in October 2011.

Read Full Post »

Inspired by the pioneers!

In February, I dedicated a post to a discussion of the amazing news that not only one but two movies in serious contention for many Academy Awards this year dealt with the worlds of silent movies: The Artist and Hugo.  As it turns out, these two films were the big winners of this year’s ceremony.  Strike up a win for visual storytelling and the legacy of the pioneers of cinema, both featured in Chapter 2 of Moving Images!  

For study of non-fiction film, this year’s feature winner is sure to be a favorite for use by many educators: Undefeated, directed by Daniel Lindsay and T.J. Martin.  (I should add that this win was a bit of a shocker, as many had picked Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory, by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky, who also made another classic contemporary documentary, Brother’s Keeper, as well as a documentary about Metallica; others picked Pina or Hell and Back Againbut it was the feel-good sports movie that won in the end.)

The Swell Season, a documentary about Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova

While we’re on the topic of documentaries and the Oscars, one of the most stirring moments of the Academy Awards in recent years occurred in 2008 for the Original Song Award for “Falling Slowly” by Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova of The Swell Season.  Since then, directors Nick August-Perna, Chris Dapkins, and Carlo Mirabella-Davis made The Swell Seasona documentary about Hansard and Irglova’s professional and personal lives, which a number of critics consider to be one of the best movies ever about music-making and the life of a couple.

For great moments from this year’s Oscars, how about the winners for Best Animated Short, William Joyce and Brandon Oldenburg, who during their acceptance speech served as a better comedy team than even old pros Zach Galifianakis and Will Ferrell.  They won for The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore, which you can watch here.

Also, to return to a celebration of award-winning documentary filmmakers, you can check out my Chapter 6 Close-Up interview of editor Deborah Hoffmann for many sharp, subtle insights and enlightening angles on the many challenges and particulars of the editing process and profession.

And one last note: as a follow-up to the earlier post about Super Bowl commercials, here is a page on the Adland.tv site that presents 40 Years of Super Bowl Commercials — very interesting material for analyses of trends in consumer behavior, cultural norms, and advertising styles, among other media topics!

Read Full Post »

Iconic image of Robert Redford in “The Candidate”

Here is an excellent discussion between Bill Moyers and Neal Gabler (with fine choices of clips from the undervalued classic The Candidate along with George Clooney’s The Ides of March).  Gabler and Moyers discuss many issues that will be featured themes of this blog and work especially well with issues raised in Chapters 5 and 6 of Moving Images: the influence of movies on politics; news literacy; advertising culture and democracy; the struggle between depth and superficiality in moving images, media narratives, acting, creative expression, and independent thought.  This interview is exceptionally informative, thought provoking, and useful for debate and further inquiry; it is simply a treasure trove for studies of media literacy and contemporary culture — political and otherwise.  Highly recommended!

I will be back soon with discussion of the Oscars and useful links regarding the movies that got the nods from the Academy voters.   And here’s another interesting link: Neal Gabler’s choices for Ten Great Political Films.

Read Full Post »

Deborah Hoffmann, center, receiving a Silver Baton award at Columbia University (Charlie Rose at right)

For Chapter 6 of Moving Images — titled Recording and Presenting Reality — the Close-Up interview features insights from Deborah Hoffmann into the work involved in documentary filmmaking and the editing process.  Hoffmann has been working for the past few decades as a documentary editor and director, and her work includes the award-winning movies The Times of Harvey MilkComplaints of a Dutiful Daughterand A Long Night’s Journey into Day.  

Did you have any early inspirations to use moving images to communicate? 

When I was in college, I got very involved in still photography, and the one connecting thing – other than liking working with images – was that I got very involved with putting on exhibits, and I really liked thinking through the order of the images, so that viewers can have a specific type of experience going to the event.  That was the beginning for me.  It took a while for me to get from there to being involved in making documentaries, but I think that was where it began.

Describe the path you took to become an editor.  Did you initially plan on working as an editor?  Did you specifically choose to work in the documentary field? 

Things were not that well thought out for me.  A lot of my career was a bit of fumbling around in a series of accidents for me to end up where I ended up.  I did sort of fall in with a crowd of documentary filmmakers and because of my background as a still photographer, I initially was going towards being a cinematographer.  It just so happened that I developed a back problem, and I couldn’t deal with the equipment, so I shifted over to looking into editing, not realizing that sitting all day isn’t really that much better for your back.  Nonetheless, I found myself moving towards editing, and it was a really fortuitous change, because I love editing and am very well attuned to it.  So, slightly accidental, but I think it was meant to be.

During this shift to editing, what were your initial steps professionally? 

Because this was the 1970s, there’s a way in which my personal story doesn’t really translate to today. These days, I teach documentary editing at the graduate school level at UC Berkeley’s school of journalism. I never went to [film] school, I never studied documentary filmmaking, and I was able to find my way to make a career out of it.  I think that’s a lot harder today.  So, my path, I really don’t think, is what kids coming along today can do.  I began by volunteering as an assistant editor on a documentary in the mid-70s, and I got very lucky because very shortly thereafter I began volunteering on Dark Circle, a documentary about the anti-nuclear movement directed by Judy Irving.  They got funding very quickly after I began, and there I was, I had a job.  I worked as an assistant editor – and, again, this is dated stuff, because I was editing on film and I was doing a job that virtually no longer even exists.  I went from assistant editor to sound editor, and I was very determined and very devoted, and I was able to start making deals, “I’ll be assistant editor if you let me edit a scene.”  That happened on one project, then on the next project I edited enough scenes to be associate editor, and then I was off and running and editing film.

When you first started editing films for other directors, was there anything that surprised you about the process?  Any lessons that you learned from your early efforts? 

It’s a very delicate relationship. I remember very early on, when I was an assistant working with an editor, he said to me, “You know, the relationship between the editor and the director is more difficult than a marriage.”  And I’ve always remembered that, and there’s a lot of truth, not that it needs to be difficult, but it is a very complicated relationship, and of course when I became a director, now I’ve seen it from both sides.  Directors are handing over their baby, and that’s their point of view.  And the editor feels like, “I can really see what’s working and what’s not, and the director is too close to the material.”  So there’s that tension, and I think that this tension can be really helpful in film.  And when I teach the students that I teach, and they’re editing their own films, and I always tell them, “You are doing the most difficult thing possible.”  You go out, you round up the subjects, stand in the snow and rain to film them and go through all that, you become convinced you’ve got a masterpiece and every frame is wonderful.  And the person who didn’t do any of that and they’re just seeing what ended up in the footage – and not what the entire surrounding experience was – which can allow them to see more clearly.  So when you’re editing your own material, you have a unique challenge compared to when you’re editing someone else’s material.

Filmmaker Deborah Hoffmann with her mother, Doris

You have also directed documentaries.  What inspired you to do this?  Was your previous work as an editor helpful to your role as a director? 

Well, if I ruled the world, or at least the world of documentary film, I would make every director be an editor first, because I do think that you learn so much about what makes a scene and what tells a story by actually having to do it in the editing room.  So I felt it was really, really helpful that I had been editing before I was directing.  The first thing I directed was a personal film I made about my mother and Alzheimer’s, and that was almost not a decision, it was just an overriding need that I had to make that film.  So I did.  And then I thought, this is kind of fun, you get to make all the final decisions.  There was something very appealing about that, and so I thought of dividing my time between editing other people’s projects and directing.

As a documentary editor, what distinctive challenges do you face in contrast to editors of fiction motion pictures? 

Let me just say that I’ve never edited fiction features, so what I’m saying you can take with a grain of salt, but I think that a documentary editor has a much more thrilling job than a fiction editor because you really find a make the story in the editing room.  You do wonderful things as a fiction editor too, but you’re not sort of writing the story, and I feel that you really are doing that as a documentary editor.  It’s a wonderful thing, and you really can discover unexpected things in the editing room.

Could you comment on the process of editing documentary films and some of the ways in which you have experienced a particular project? 

Unless I was doing something historic that was mostly archival – and even then there would be current interviews – it was not a long time after the shooting process, and in fact, it was usually while the shooting process was still happening that I would be brought on.  So, I could start editing, we could see where the weaknesses were, and we could see what filming still had to happen.  I think that absolutely works the best.  I think this is also smart financially, for directors not just to film everything and see if they’ve got it later, assuming it’s not something where they’re halfway around the world and it’s a one-time thing.  But if the project is one in which you can go back and fill in the holes.

Long Night’s Journey Into Day, Produced for HBO Documentaries

Documentary filmmakers seek funding from a variety of sources, including institutional grants and foundations. Taking one movie as an example, how have you sought support for your projects? 

The biggest project we had to fundraise for was the film we did about South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission called Long Night’s Journey into Day.  I made that with my partner Frances Reid, we started that in 1997 and it was 90 percent funded by foundations and the remainder funded by individual donations.  We sold it to HBO and that’s how we got our finishing funds. But 1997 was a very different time economically than now, it was sort of a peak.  Here we were making a film about reconciliation, which was a hot topic then. Fundraising is never easy, but that was one of the easier experiences I know about. In fact, there was one foundation that responded to our request and said, “Actually, we want to give you more.” We were very fortunate, and I think right now it’s very tough for documentary films.  But right now, documentarians can be a one-man-band.  A lot of my students, they go all over the world, they take one crew person with them, and they do everything incredibly cheaply, and then they edit it at home with Final Cut Pro.  The expenses have come down in a lot of ways, but it’s still tough in a lot of ways.

What has been your experience of the collaborative nature of the filmmaking process?  Are there particular relationships that have been fruitful to you in your career? 

It is extraordinarily collaborative.  I’ve been very, very lucky in that all of my collaborative experiences have been quite wonderful, in fact they are some of the most wonderful experiences in my life.  For instance, from the first major film that I was the editor of, The Times of Harvey Milk, the people I worked with on that have been best friends ever since then.  I’ve formed many long-lasting relationships, and I love that give-and-take collaborative.

What have been some of the greatest challenges you have faced during your filmmaking endeavors? 

Most of them are economics.  If you’re doing your own projects, the constant search for money can really beat you down.  If you’re working for other people and you want to be working independently as I always did – that you don’t want to be working for a TV station or the news – then you are constantly looking for work.  You can feel very insecure a lot of the time.  It’s grueling work, but it’s thrilling work, so until you get burned out, your problem will not be that you’re unhappy at your work.

What have been among your most fulfilling experiences in moviemaking? 

One thing I feel that I haven’t said is that sometimes I feel that there’s a selfish, cheating thing being a documentary filmmaker, because it was a way to go places and meet people that you would otherwise have no way of experiencing.  You have the excuse of making this film, and you meet the most fantastic people in the world.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »